It's a curious experience, coming across the work of an artist that speaks directly to one: the shock, not of the new, but of the weirdly familiar. It is strange, hallucinatory, discombobulating, like meeting a doppelganger: as if one had in an absent-minded moment succeeded in putting the contents of one's own mind on paper or canvas or in bronze or marble and forgotten about it.
Idly ambling into a gallery in Bath, I had exactly this experience with Clive Hicks-Jenkins' work.
On display were some examples of the Mari Lwyd sequence. The Deposition made me gasp. Where had I seen these images before? That horse? The man, tense, lean, muscled, with his great sculpted feet and massive calves? The winding sheet? The distant watchtower? Even the palette, a sort of grisaille undershot with pink and blue, the whole composition veined, not just the man or the horse, as if x-rayed? It is of course the stuff of dreams, but my own dreams - that transfigured man, suffering, perhaps dying, perhaps dead was me, but also Men; the rescuing horse - Pegasus, Bucephalus, but also Fuesli's nightmare - as bare, as sexual, as potent as the man, wrapped around in sheets belonging to the couch of lust as well as to the death bed, twisted in erotic ecstasy but equally in the throes of illness and death. Tristan's watchtower presaging never-absent and nameless threat.
As I came to know other of Hicks-Jenkins' works I found that the iconography there was from the inside of my own skull, too, from my soul's panorama: The Vision of Angels Ascending seeming to contrast angels red with Pentecostal flame and the brooding man, surrounded by animals close to gargoyles, the empty roofless house behind him, the dead man at his feet, empty arid valleys stretching behind. This is a page from my autobiography. The flaming beauty of the angels brings threat, the demand of a death before rebirth becomes possible. How did Hicks-Jenkins get inside my head?
Simon Callow
May 2005
|